Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1392Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Dobrota, Marina | |
| dc.creator | Martić, Milan | |
| dc.creator | Bulajić, Milica | |
| dc.creator | Jeremić, Veljko | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-12T10:53:57Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-05-12T10:53:57Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0308-5961 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1392 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The development of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) is an important issue that affects countries' socioeconomic prosperity, and the majority of studies indicate that the productivity effect of ICT is quite significant. Thus, measuring the countries information development can gain numerous benefits since comparisons and rankings create a major challenge for countries' further advancement and development. The aim of this paper is multiple. It firstly elaborates the term of the information society and examines countries' ICT development. Secondly, it debates on the importance of measurement and ranking, emphasizing the methods of measuring the information society. It reviews the ICT Development Index (IDI) as one of these methods, pointing to its drawbacks. The disadvantages of the IDI are mostly related to its bias and uncertainty. This paper accentuates the importance of the stability and objectiveness of a measurement method, and for this reason it presents the Composite I-distance Indicator (CIDI) methodology for measuring countries' ICT development that overcomes these drawbacks. In the case study, we analysed a dataset of 157 countries. The results presented in this study clearly indicate that the CIDI ranking methodology is unbiased and more stable than the official IDI ranking methodology, and can be used as an appropriate framework for information society evaluation measurement. | en |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier Sci Ltd, Oxford | |
| dc.rights | restrictedAccess | |
| dc.source | Telecommunications Policy | |
| dc.subject | Uncertainty analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Technologies (ICT) | en |
| dc.subject | Sensitivity analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Information and Communication | en |
| dc.subject | I-distance method | en |
| dc.subject | ICT Development Index (IDI) | en |
| dc.subject | Composite indicators | en |
| dc.subject | CIDI methodology | en |
| dc.title | Two-phased composite I-distance indicator approach for evaluation of countries' information development | en |
| dc.type | article | |
| dc.rights.license | ARR | |
| dc.citation.epage | 420 | |
| dc.citation.issue | 5 | |
| dc.citation.other | 39(5): 406-420 | |
| dc.citation.rank | M22 | |
| dc.citation.spage | 406 | |
| dc.citation.volume | 39 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.telpol.2015.03.003 | |
| dc.identifier.rcub | conv_1718 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84930182953 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | 000356733000003 | |
| dc.type.version | publishedVersion | |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.grantfulltext | restricted | - |
| item.openairetype | article | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
| Appears in Collections: | Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1388.pdf Restricted Access | 449.12 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.