Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1409
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorIšljamović, Sonja
dc.creatorJeremić, Veljko
dc.creatorPetrović, Nataša
dc.creatorRadojičić, Zoran
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-12T10:54:48Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-12T10:54:48Z-
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn0033-5177
dc.identifier.urihttps://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1409-
dc.description.abstractThe indicator-based research papers represent a substantial part of socioeconomic sphere, but the controversy about the choice of indicators and aggregation methods still remains. The aim of our paper is twofold: first, to elaborate the use of indicators in assessing socioeconomic development and welfare of countries, and in particular, to review the socioeconomic and welfare indicators in order to form a theoretical framework. Secondly, the idea of the paper is to emphasize the importance of incorporating environmental indicators into the evaluation of socioeconomic development. To this end we suggest the implementation of ecological footprint and environmental performance index, along with frequently used indicators such as GDP per capita, unemployment rate, etc. In addition, applying a statistical I-distance method we were able to overcome the problems concerning the aggregation of composite indicator using presumably biased weighting factors. As a case study we analyzed a dataset of 25 European Union countries, starting with 2007 and ending with the last available data of 2012. The results presented in this study clearly indicated EU countries with high level of socioeconomic development, with a special emphasis on the underlying dynamics of a five-year period. One of the contributions lies in the application of an I-distance method which can easily integrate economic, social and environmental variables with different measurement units into one composite indicator. Moreover, our approach could be a foundation for an appropriate framework of countries' welfare evaluation which would be unbiased i.e. independent from subjectively formed weighting factors. The ecological footprint and environmental performance index as environmental indicators proved to be essential part of an I-distance framework for countries' welfare evaluation.en
dc.publisherSpringer, Dordrecht
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceQuality & Quantity
dc.subjectSustainable developmenten
dc.subjectRanking of countriesen
dc.subjectI-distance methoden
dc.subjectEuropeen
dc.subjectEcological footprinten
dc.subjectCountry's welfareen
dc.titleColouring the socio-economic development into green: I-distance framework for countries' welfare evaluationen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dc.citation.epage629
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.other49(2): 617-629
dc.citation.rankM22
dc.citation.spage617
dc.citation.volume49
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11135-014-0012-0
dc.identifier.rcubconv_1699
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84930177298
dc.identifier.wos000352509200013
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1405.pdf
  Restricted Access
212.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

24
checked on Nov 17, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.