Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1714
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorAdizes, Ichak
dc.creatorRodić, Dušanka
dc.creatorČudanov, Mladen
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-12T11:10:29Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-12T11:10:29Z-
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1820-0222
dc.identifier.urihttps://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1714-
dc.description.abstractThis paper surveys perception bias regarding the timing of proactive consultant engagement. It aims to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of consultant engagement. Research is based on the primary dataset from South Eastern Europe and the secondary dataset which is used for comparison as the real life cycle phase of consultant engagement. Adizes life cycle model provided our theoretical framework. After data were checked for normality, t-test was used for hypotheses confirmation/rejection. The T-test confirmed the existence of negative bias in early life cycle phases, onesamplet (118) =-16,232, p = 0.000. Significant differences were found for bias of early phases in organisations founded less than 25 years ago (M= -0.301, SD=0.22) and organisations founded more than 25 years ago (M= -0.396, SD=0.24); t(110)= 2.072, p=0.041; also, absolute bias in organisations founded less than 25 years ago (M=1.32, SD=0.27) and organisations founded more than 25 years ago (M=1.20, SD=0.31) is significantly different t(110)= -2.204, p=0.030. Significant differences were not found between early life cycle stages bias of consultants (M= -0.374, SD=0.26) and users of consulting services (M -0.368, SD=0.22); t(117)= 0.475, p=0.636 but absolute bias in organisations with less than 25 years of chronological age (M=1.32, SD=0.27) and organisations with more than 25 years of chronological age (M=1.20, SD=0.31) is significantly different t(117)=- 1.348, p=0.180. This research finds strong bias in estimation of life cycle phase as time for engagement of proactive consulting services. The timing for consultant engagement is not often correctly estimated by the users of the service, so those services can be engaged as preventive before issues arise in organisation and become a crisis at the tip of the organisational iceberg. The main limitations of our research are that we do not have true random sample and that data is from South Eastern Europe which limits broader generalization.en
dc.publisherUniverzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet organizacionih nauka, Beograd
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceManagement: Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies
dc.subjectSouth Eastern Europeen
dc.subjectmanagementen
dc.subjectcorporate life cycleen
dc.subjectconsultingen
dc.subjectconsultant engagementen
dc.subjectAdizes life cycleen
dc.titleEstimating consultant engagement in the corporate life cycle: Study of the Bias in South Eastern Europeen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-ND
dc.citation.epage12
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.other22(2): 1-12
dc.citation.rankM24
dc.citation.spage1
dc.citation.volume22
dc.identifier.doi10.7595/management.fon.2017.0015
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://prototype2.rcub.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/421/1710.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubconv_828
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1710.pdf19.21 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons