Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1884
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorMaričić, Milica
dc.creatorĐoković, Aleksandar
dc.creatorJeremić, Veljko
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-12T11:19:02Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-12T11:19:02Z-
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1848-5189
dc.identifier.urihttps://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1884-
dc.description.abstractStudent evaluation of teaching (SET) has steadily, but surely, become an important assessment tool in higher education. Although the SET provides feedback on the student level of satisfaction with the course and the lecturer, the validity of its results has been questioned. Following extensive studies, the factor which is believed to distort the SET results is the lecturer's gender. In this paper, Potthoff analysis is employed to additionally explore whether there is any gender bias in the SET. Namely, this analysis has been used with great success to compare the linear regression models across groups. Herein, we aimed to model the overall lecturer impression with independent variables related to teaching, communication skills and grading, and to compare the models between genders. The obtained results reveal that the gender bias exists in certain cases in the observed SET. We believe that our research might provide additional insights into the interesting topic of gender bias in the SET.en
dc.publisherFac Teacher Education, Zagreb
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Integrated and Interdisciplinary Research (IIR or III)/47003/RS//
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.sourceCroatian Journal of Education / Hrvatski casopis za odgoj i obrazovanje
dc.subjectstudent evaluation of teachingen
dc.subjectPotthoff analysisen
dc.subjecthigher educationen
dc.subjectgender biasen
dc.subjecteducational data miningen
dc.titleThe Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching: Is There a Gender Bias?en
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY-NC-ND
dc.citation.epage775
dc.citation.issue3
dc.citation.other21(3): 743-775
dc.citation.rankM23
dc.citation.spage743
dc.citation.volume21
dc.identifier.doi10.15516/cje.v21i3.3177
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://prototype2.rcub.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/533/1880.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubconv_2077
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85078433027
dc.identifier.wos000495696800003
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1880.pdf295.62 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on Nov 17, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons