Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2376
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorJovanović, Predrag
dc.creatorDelibašić, Boris
dc.creatorČudanov, Mladen
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-12T11:44:16Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-12T11:44:16Z-
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1581-5374
dc.identifier.urihttps://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2376-
dc.description.abstractThe paper analyses a situation where the efficient public procurement legislative framework formally exists, but in practice, the process does not work as planned. The data were gathered from one hundred contracting authorities in the Republic of Serbia, based on a nationwide survey conducted on public procurement officers (PPOs) and end-users (ENUs) in all contracting authorities. We propose a model for measuring organisational discrepancies and classifying public procurement processes (PPP) into one of four organisational patterns, based on organisational decision-making authority and focused on goals and principles. The Mann-Whitney U (MWU) test was used to test the independent responses from two hundred PPOs and ENUs on the items - who works, who is accountable, and who has benefits, for seven key public procurement activities. The statistical analysis shows that the public procurement process in Serbia can be classified as a process with centralised organisational decision-making authority, focused on form, with demotivated public procurement officers. The efforts for further improvement of the legislation are not expected to reach their full potential until solving organisational structure, reward system, environment, and culture issues.en
dc.publisherInst Local Self-Government Maribor, Maribor
dc.relationInstitute of Social Sciences
dc.relationMinistry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceLex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government
dc.subjectpublic procurement processen
dc.subjectorganisational patternsen
dc.subjectorganisational decision-making authorityen
dc.subjectmotivationen
dc.subjectformalisationen
dc.titleOrganisational Archetypes in Public Procurementen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dc.citation.epage127
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.other20(1): 101-127
dc.citation.rankM23~
dc.citation.spage101
dc.citation.volume20
dc.identifier.doi10.4335/20.1.101-127(2022)
dc.identifier.rcubconv_2633
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85135204358
dc.identifier.wos000768786200005
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Nov 17, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.