Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2450
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorBiswas, Sanjib
dc.creatorPamučar, Dragan
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-12T11:47:56Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-12T11:47:56Z-
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2199-4730
dc.identifier.urihttps://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2450-
dc.description.abstractThe present paper has two-fold purposes. First, the current work provides an integrated theoretical framework to compare popular mobile wallet service providers based on users' views in the Indian context. To this end, we propose a new grey correlation-based Picture Fuzzy-Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (GCPF-EDAS) framework for the comparative analysis. We integrate the fundamental framework of the Technology Acceptance Model and Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology vis-a-vis service quality dimensions for criteria selection. For comparative ranking, we conduct our analysis under uncertain environments using picture fuzzy numbers. We find that user-friendliness, a wide variety of use, and familiarity and awareness about the products help reduce the uncertainty factors and obtain positive impressions from the users. It is seen that PhonePe (A3), Google Pay (A2), Amazon Pay (A4) and PayTM (A1) hold top positions. For validation of the result, we first compare the ranking provided by our proposed model with that derived by using picture fuzzy score based extensions of EDAS and another widely used algorithm such as The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution. We observe a significant consistency. We then carry out rank reversal test for GCPF-EDAS model. We notice that our proposed GCPF-EDAS model does not suffers from rank reversal phenomenon. To examine the stability in the result for further validation, we carry out the sensitivity analysis by varying the differentiating coefficient and exchanging the criteria weights. We find that our proposed method provides stable result for the present case study and performs better as ranking order does not get changed significantly with the changes in the given conditions.en
dc.publisherSpringer, New York
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceFinancial Innovation
dc.subjectTOPSISen
dc.subjectPicture fuzzyen
dc.subjectGrey correlationen
dc.subjectEDAS methoden
dc.subjectComparison of mobile walletsen
dc.titleA modified EDAS model for comparison of mobile wallet service providers in Indiaen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.other9(1): -
dc.citation.rankaM21~
dc.citation.volume9
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40854-022-00443-5
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://prototype2.rcub.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/911/2446.pdf
dc.identifier.pmid36691444
dc.identifier.rcubconv_2827
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85146557371
dc.identifier.wos000914930600002
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2446.pdf1.7 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

22
checked on Nov 17, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons