Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2541
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorAli Al-Shamiri, M.M.
dc.creatorFarooq, A.
dc.creatorNabeel, M.
dc.creatorAli, G.
dc.creatorPamučar, Dragan
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-12T11:52:30Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-12T11:52:30Z-
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2473-6988
dc.identifier.urihttps://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2541-
dc.description.abstractMany real-world decision-making issues frequently involve competing sets of criteria, uncertainty, and inaccurate information. Some of these require the involvement of a group of decision-makers, where it is necessary to reduce the various available individual preferences to a single collective preference. To enhance the effectiveness of multi-criteria decisions, multi-criteria decision-making is a popular decision-making technique that makes the procedure more precise, reasonable, and efficient. The “Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)” and “Elimination and Choice Transforming Reality (ELECTRE)” are prominent ranking methods and widely used in the multi-criteria decision-making to solve complicated decision-making problems. In this study, two m-polar fuzzy set-based ranking methods are proposed by extending the ELECTRE-I and TOPSIS approaches equipped with cubic m-polar fuzzy (CmPF) sets, where the experts provide assessment results on feasible alternatives through a CmPF decision matrix. The first proposed method, CmPF-TOPSIS, focuses on the alternative that is closest to a CmPF positive ideal solution and farthest away from the CmPF negative ideal solution. The Euclidean and normalized Euclidean distances are used to determine the proximity of an alternative to ideal solutions. In contrast, the second developed method is CmPF-ELECTRE-I which uses an outranking directed decision graph to determine the optimal alternative, which entirely depends on the CmPF concordance and discordance sets. Furthermore, a practical case study is carried out in the diagnosis of impulse control disorders to illustrate the feasibility and applicability of the proposed methods. Finally, a comparative analysis is performed to demonstrate the veracity, superiority, and effectiveness of the proposed methods.en
dc.publisherAmerican Institute of Mathematical Sciences
dc.relationThe authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University for funding this work through Large Group Research Project under grant number (R.G.P.2/181/44).
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceAIMS Mathematics
dc.subjectmulti-criteria decision-makingen
dc.subjectcomparative analysisen
dc.subjectCmPF-TOPSIS approachen
dc.subjectCmPF-ELECTRE-I approachen
dc.subjectCmPF seten
dc.titleIntegrating TOPSIS and ELECTRE-I methods with cubic m-polar fuzzy sets and its application to the diagnosis of psychiatric disordersen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY
dc.citation.epage11915
dc.citation.issue5
dc.citation.other8(5): 11875-11915
dc.citation.rankaM21~
dc.citation.spage11875
dc.citation.volume8
dc.identifier.doi10.3934/math.2023601
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://prototype2.rcub.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/947/2537.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubconv_3772
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85150519114
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2537.pdf1.27 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Nov 17, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons