Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2545
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorQahtan, Sarah
dc.creatorAlsattar, H.A.
dc.creatorZaidan, A.A.
dc.creatorDeveci, Muhammet
dc.creatorPamučar, Dragan
dc.creatorDelen, Dursun
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-12T11:52:42Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-12T11:52:42Z-
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn0957-4174
dc.identifier.urihttps://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2545-
dc.description.abstractThis paper proposes a novel ship energy systems (SESs) benchmarking model for performance measurement of sustainable transportation based on the extension of q-rung orthopair fuzzy rough sets (q-ROFRS) and multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. The underlying research methodology consists of two main stages: (i) Formulation of the SES decision matrix between SESs and the sustainability, (ii) Development of a q-ROFRS and fuzzy-weighted zero-inconsistency (q-ROFRS–FWZIC) model to determine the weights of each criterion. The integrated model of the q-ROFRS and fuzzy decision by the opinion score method (q-ROFRS-FDOSM) is offered as a tool for benchmarking the SESs. Sixty-two SESs are evaluated and benchmarked according to the three layers of criteria concerning the five design alternatives. The analysis of the proposed q-ROFRS–FWZIC methodology revealed that decision support methods (C2) is the most important criterion with a weight of 0.4174, followed by gas emissions (C1.1.2) and economic criterion (C1.1.1) with weights of 0.1661 and 0.1498, respectively; and energy efficiency design index (C1.2.1) is the least important. Furthermore, the results from q-ROFRS-FDOSM reveal that SES62 is the most suitable SES followed by SES60, whereas SES37 is the least suitable. Finally, the robustness of the proposed method is assessed by conducting a sensitivity analysis.en
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relationThanks in advance to the entire team who have tirelessly worked on this project, and the people who support us in any other way. Also, we want to thank the Royal School of Mines and Imperial College London for their support.
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourceExpert Systems with Applications
dc.subjectShip energy systemsen
dc.subjectQ-rung orthopair fuzzy rough setsen
dc.subjectMulti-criteria decision makingen
dc.subjectFuzzy-weighted with zero inconsistencyen
dc.subjectFuzzy decision by opinion score methoden
dc.titlePerformance assessment of sustainable transportation in the shipping industry using a q-rung orthopair fuzzy rough sets-based decision making methodologyen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseARR
dc.citation.other223: -
dc.citation.rankaM21~
dc.citation.volume223
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119958
dc.identifier.rcubconv_3783
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85151375084
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

56
checked on Nov 17, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.