Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3147
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorPamučar, Draganen_US
dc.creatorSimić, Vladimiren_US
dc.creatorDabić-Miletić, Svetlanaen_US
dc.creatorZaidan, Aws Aalaaen_US
dc.creatorPetrović, Natašaen_US
dc.creatorNarayanamoorthy, Samayanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-19T06:54:24Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-19T06:54:24Z-
dc.date.issued2024-12-
dc.identifier.urihttps://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3147-
dc.description.abstractThe consequences for the ecosystem of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) waste are becoming increasingly significant and widespread. Companies managing PET waste strive to enhance sustainability in all areas. The development of systematic decision-making approaches and frameworks for PET waste management is strongly needed. This research aims to present a new methodological framework for the categorization of the most efficient PET waste management solutions. The introduced fuzzy Frank weighted sum product assessment (FWESPA) model enables rational and flexible reasoning by nonlinearly processing uncertain information. A nonlinear aggregation function is proposed for the fusion of fuzzy strategic options. It is advantageous in simulating the impact of strategic options on a final decision. An integral part of the introduced fuzzy FWESPA model is a reverse sorting algorithm. This innovative algorithm can improve the performance of traditional normalization techniques. Also, an improved fuzzy Frank ordinal priority approach linear model is formulated to define the significance of evaluation criteria. The comprehensive real-life study demonstrates the proposed decision-analytics-based approach. The results showed the following rankings of considered alternatives: “recycling” (ℤA2 = 0.8565) > “energy recovery” (ℤA1 = 0.7364) > “remanufacturing” (ℤA4 = 0.690) > “incineration” (ℤA3 = 0.6592). Based on the results presented, alternatives “recycling” (A2) and “energy recovery” (A1) represent dominant alternatives with a slight advantage of recycling. Research findings can be used when deciding the appropriate way to enhance PET waste handling. The findings also describe the benefits and limitations of each treatment option for PET waste, as well as highlight the crucial challenges.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherELSEVIERen_US
dc.rightsopenAccessen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.sourceEngineering Applications of Artificial Intelligenceen_US
dc.titleSustainable management of polyethylene terephthalate waste flow using a fuzzy frank weighted assessment modelen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.rights.licenseCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.citation.issuePart Aen_US
dc.citation.otherPamucar, D., Simic, V., Dabic-Miletic, S., Zaidan, A. A., Petrović, N., & Narayanamoorthy, S. (2024). Sustainable management of polyethylene terephthalate waste flow using a fuzzy frank weighted assessment model. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 138, 109254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109254en_US
dc.citation.rankM21a+en_US
dc.citation.volume138en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109254-
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons