Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3194
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorStanojević, Bogdanaen_US
dc.creatorPantelić, Ognjenen_US
dc.creatorDzitac, Simonaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-25T09:05:02Z-
dc.date.available2025-12-25T09:05:02Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttps://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3194-
dc.description.abstractOptimization involving fuzzy numbers generally, and intuitionistic fuzzy numbers particularly is more and more an essential part of any computational intelligence method; and might be of interest in modeling fuzzy control systems, or carrying out a fuzzy sensitivity analysis. The recent literature includes many research papers related to both theoretical modelling, and practical implementation of fuzzy decision support systems. Fuzzy optimization is one of the main part in such decisionmaking tools. A realistic solution to a fuzzy optimization problem is always desired, and similarly, a Pareto optimal solution to a multiple objective optimization problem is always a need. In this paper we analyze the shortcomings; and eliminate the weaknesses of a solution approach from the literature proposed by Moges et al. in 2023. Firstly, Moges et al. used an accuracy function to de-fuzzify the original intuitionistic fuzzy optimization problem; then linearized the obtained crisp problem; and finally involved fuzzy goals to solve the derived multiple objective linear problem. We present two faulty key points of their approach, namely the de-fuzzification and linearization steps; prove the inappropriateness of their results; and propose some improvements. The final aim in addressing the first key point is to clarify the border between defuzzifications made in accordance to true theoretical statements, and those made for modeling reasons. The methodological improvement we propose is related to the second key point and it assures that Pareto optimal solutions - highly required in multiple objective optimization - are obtained. To illustrate our point of view, we use a numerical example from the literature, and report better numerical results derived by the improved methodology.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsopenAccessen_US
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Computers, Communications and Controlen_US
dc.subjectfuzzy mathematical programmingen_US
dc.subjectlinear fractional programmingen_US
dc.subjectmulti-objective optimizationen_US
dc.subjectmulti-objective optimization, intuitionistic fuzzy numbersen_US
dc.titleEnhanced Solutions to Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multiobjective Linear Fractional Optimization Problems via Lexicographic Methoden_US
dc.typeconferenceObjecten_US
dc.citation.rankM22en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.15837/ijccc.2024.1.6333-
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen_US
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeconferenceObject-
Appears in Collections:Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

8
checked on Dec 28, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.