Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1049
Title: Factors influencing beliefs for adoption of a learning analytics tool: An empirical study
Authors: Ali, Liaqat
Asadi, Mohsen
Gašević, Dragan
Jovanović, Jelena 
Hatala, Marek
Keywords: quantitative evaluation;Ontologies;Learning analytics;LAAM;Feedback;E-learning
Issue Date: 2013
Publisher: Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford
Abstract: Present research and development offer various learning analytics tools providing insights into different aspects of learning processes. Adoption of a specific tool for practice is based on how its learning analytics are perceived by educators to support their pedagogical and organizational goals. In this paper, we propose and empirically validate a Learning Analytics Acceptance Model (LAAM) of factors influencing the beliefs of educators concerning the adoption a learning analytics tool. In particular, our model explains how the usage beliefs (i.e., ease-of-use and usefulness perceptions) about the learning analytics of a tool are associated with the intention to adopt the tool. In our study, we considered several factors that could potentially affect the adoption beliefs: i) pedagogical knowledge and information design skills of educators; ii) educators' perceived utility of a learning analytics tool; and iii) educators' perceived ease-of-use of a learning analytics tool. By following the principles of Technology Acceptance Model, the study is done with a sample of educators who experimented with a LOCO-Analyst tool. Our study also determined specific analytics types that are primary antecedence of perceived usefulness (concept comprehension and social interaction) and ease-of-use (interactive visualization).
URI: https://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1049
ISSN: 0360-1315
Appears in Collections:Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1045.pdf
  Restricted Access
2.55 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

94
checked on Nov 17, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.