Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1366
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorSimeunović, Barbara
dc.creatorSlović, Dragoslav
dc.creatorRadaković Andreja, Jelena
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-12T10:52:38Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-12T10:52:38Z-
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn1451-6551
dc.identifier.urihttps://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1366-
dc.description.abstractU literaturi se može pronaći veliki broj modela koji pružaju smernice za razvoj sistema za merenje performansi procesa i ispituju probleme merenja performansi iz različitih perspektiva. U radu su razmatrani neki od najznačajnijih modela za merenje performansi procesa, izvršena je njihova uporedna analiza prema 11 kriterijuma i primećeno je da većina tih modela polazi od strategije ili ciljeva pri određivanju performansi, ali i da većina njih ne specificira indikatore performansi, već samo daje naznake kako doći do njih. Takođe, nijedan model ne povezuje direktno ciljeve organizacije i indikatore performansi procesa, što smanjuje njihovu fleksibilnost i adaptabilnost. Na osnovu toga, identifikovana je potreba za razvojem novog modela, koji bi prevazišao navedene nedostatke, što predstavlja pravac daljeg istraživanja.sr
dc.description.abstractIn the literature, there are number of models that provide guidelines for the performance measurement system development and examine performance measurement problems from different perspectives. In this paper, some of the most important performance measurement models are considered. Furthermore, comparative analysis of these models, according to 11 criteria, was done. It was noticed that the majority of models takes into account the strategy or goals while determining performance but most of them don't specify performance indicators and only give an indication for their determination. Also, none of models link directly organizational goals and process performance indicators, which would allow model flexibility and adaptibility. On this basis, the need to develop a new model that would overcome these shortcomings was identified, and this represents a direction for further research.en
dc.publisherVisoka poslovna škola strukovnih studija, Novi Sad
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceŠkola biznisa
dc.subjectprocesisr
dc.subjectmodeli za merenje performansi procesasr
dc.subjectmerenje performansi procesasr
dc.subjectkriterijumisr
dc.subjectindikatori performansi procesasr
dc.subjectciljevisr
dc.subjectanalizasr
dc.subjectprocessesen
dc.subjectprocess performance measurementen
dc.subjectprocess performance measurement modelsen
dc.subjectprocess performance indicatorsen
dc.subjectgoalsen
dc.subjectcriteriaen
dc.subjectanalysisen
dc.titleAnaliza modela za merenje performansi procesasr
dc.titleAnalysis of process performance measurement modelsen
dc.typearticle
dc.rights.licenseBY
dc.citation.epage64
dc.citation.issue2
dc.citation.other(2): 49-64
dc.citation.rankM53
dc.citation.spage49
dc.identifier.doi10.5937/skolbiz2-9630
dc.identifier.fulltexthttp://prototype2.rcub.bg.ac.rs/bitstream/id/195/1362.pdf
dc.identifier.rcubconv_772
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1362.pdf656.66 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons