Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/170| Title: | Poređenje analize obavijanja podataka i metode PROMETHEE pri izboru personalnog računara A comparison of data envelopment analysis and PROMETHEE method on the example of evaluating personal computers |
Authors: | Martić, Milan Savić, Gordana Vujošević, Mirko |
Keywords: | višekriterijumska analiza;rangiranje;analiza obavijanja podataka;ranking;multi-criterion analysis;data envelopment analysis | Issue Date: | 1998 | Publisher: | Jedinstveni informatički savez-JISA, Beograd | Abstract: | U ovom radu su opisani osnovni koncepti analize obavijanja podataka i na primeru ocenjivanja ponuda za kupovinu personalnih računara prikazani su rezultati dobijeni primenom ove metode kao i metode PROMETHEE koja je izabrana kao predstavnik metoda višekriterijumske analize. Obe metode su namenjene ocenjivanju i rangiranju srodnih entiteta i imaju dosta sličnosti. Bitna razlika je u odnosu prema težinskim koeficijentima koji se dodeljuju kriterijumima. U metodama višekriterijumske analize ovi koeficijenti se dodeljuju unapred dok se u analizi obavijanja podataka za svaki entitet određuju težinski koeficijenti tako da se on prikaže u najboljem mogućem svetlu. Na konkretnom primeru su pokazane sličnosti, prednosti i nedostaci korišćenih metoda. Na kraju je prikazana jedna mogućnost povezivanja i zajedničkog korišćenja analize obavijanja podataka i višekriterijumske analize. Data envelopment analysis and multicriterion analysis are methods which are used for evaluating and ranking of similar units. Both incorporate a model, which features a process of assigning weights to criteria. The weights in data envelopment analysis are determined so that each unit is as efficient as possible, but in multicriterion decision analysis their values are proposed by decision makers. The evaluation and ranking of different personal computer configurations is chosen as an appropriate example for comparison of these methods. The problem is solved by both of the methods. The obtained results are similar. Finally, a way of the integration of these two methods is presented. |
URI: | https://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/170 | ISSN: | 0354-5334 |
| Appears in Collections: | Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications |
Show full item record
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.