Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2047
Title: Is the personalized approach the key to improve clinical diagnosis of peri-implant conditions? The role of bone markers
Authors: Rakić, Mia
Monje, Alberto
Radovanović, Sandro 
Petkovic-Curcin, Aleksandra
Vojvodić, Danilo
Tatić, Zoran
Keywords: precision medicine;personalized medicine;peri-implantitis;peri-implant mucositis;diagnosis;biomarkers
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: Wiley, Hoboken
Abstract: Background Study objectives were 1) to estimate diagnostic capacity of clinical parameters, receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) to diagnose healthy peri-implant condition (HI), peri-implant mucositis (PIM) and peri-implantitis (PIMP) by assessing respective diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic ranges 2) to develop personalized diagnostic model (PDM) for implant monitoring. Methods Split-mouth study included 126 patients and 252 implants (HI = 126, PIM = 57, and PIMP = 69). RANKL and OPG concentrations were estimated in peri-implant crevicular fluid using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method and assessed with clinical parameters using routine statistics, while the diagnostic capacity of individual parameters and overall clinical diagnosis were estimated using classifying algorithms. PDM was developed using decision trees. Results Bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index, and probing depth (PD) were confirmed reliable discriminants between peri-implant health and disease, while increase in PD (PD > 4 mm) and suppuration were good discriminants amongst PIM/PIMP. Bone turnover markers (BTMs) demonstrated presence of bone resorption in PIM; between comparable diagnostic ranges PIM/PIMP, PIMP was clinically distinguished from PIM in about 60% of patients while 40% remained diagnosed as false negatives. PDM demonstrated highest diagnostic capacity (accuracy: 96.27%, sensitivity: 95.00%, specificity: 100%) and defined HI: BOP LT = 0.25%; PIM: BOP >0.25%, PD LT = 4.5 mm; PIMP: BOP >0.25%, PD >4.5 mm and RANKL LT = 19.9 pg/site; PIM: BOP >0.25%, PD >4.5 mm, and RANKL >19.9 pg/site. Conclusions BTMs demonstrated capacity to substantially improve clinical diagnosis of peri-implant conditions. Considering lack of difference in BTMs between PIM/PIMP and cluster of PIM with exceeding BTMs, a more refined definition of peri-implant conditions according to biological characteristics is required for further BTMs validation and appropriate PIMP management.
URI: https://rfos.fon.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2047
ISSN: 0022-3492
Appears in Collections:Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

27
checked on Nov 17, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.